The Treaty of Versailles was completely unfair to Germany. It took away too much from the country who wasn't all at fault for the war. The direct cause of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand actually had nothing to do with them and only just caused them to mobilize troops faster than planned. One of their allies also dropped out of the war leaving them to fend for themselves. Out of all the allied leaders I agreed with Woodrow Wilson the most. He stood for world peace even though not all of the other leaders stood for the same values as he did. He wanted to be lenient on Germany, which would make the German people a lot less enraged with the Allies. The most fair of the provisions on the Treaty was the financial implications made on Germany. The amount of money the they were made to pay was way over an amount that they could ever dream to pay off making them permanently in debt. The most fair provision to me was the military cutoffs. I can see why they wanted to take away from Germany's military. They wanted to keep them from trying to overthrow the Allies which is understandable.
Whether or not an Anglo-American confrontation with Japan over Shandong at Paris would have prevented the tragic events of 1937-1941 is one of the big questions of history. But the 70th anniversary of the Treaty of Versailles provides an occasion for reflection on this question and the opportunity which was lost for putting Anglo-Chinese relations on a new footing.
· For the best answers, search on this site https:///ax5rO No, it wasn't intended to be fair . The dual purposes of the Treaty were to ...